Why do people argue when they are clueless?
Written By solepsis on Jan. 20, 2008.
6 Comments
Report Note
+ Clip This
I was at my neighbor's place a few minutes ago, and he mentioned that he was getting a new phone this week and was thinking about the Motorola Q. I suggested an iPhone instead. He had several illogical and erroneous points as to why he wouldn't:
- he said Verizon had the "biggest" network in America
- he said the iPhone wouldn't run on Verizon's network because it wasn't "powerful" enough
- a guy he knew at the Verizon store said that Verizon was open their network to any phones in the near future.
There were a few other also, but this is sufficient for now. I tried kindly to explain that all of his points were wrong (maybe I should have given him something). After the Cingular merger, AT&T Wireless has more subscribers than any network in the U.S., although Verizon still has higher revenue. The iPhone won't run on Verizon's network because it isn't CDMA. Building it as a CDMA phone would have drastically reduced its worldwide appeal because most cellular networks outside of North America are GSM. Also, Verizon can't open their network to every phone because simply because the plurality, if not majority, of phones on the market are GSM and will never work on Verizon's current network. Verizon has offered to open their network to other CDMA phones, which include phones from these carriers: Alltel, Cellcom, Cellular South, Cricket Communications (from Leap Wireless), MetroPCS, Sprint PCS, U.S. Cellular. Not a rousing list, but better than nothing. I tried to tell him that keep up with my tech. All he said was "You always have to be right."
Anyways, besides getting this of my chest to someone that might possibly agree with me, or at least have some knowledge on the topic, I ask "Why do people argue about things they have little or no knowledge of?"
I am always right! ;)

shadowsun7
Written Jan. 20, 2008 / Report /
Because they're fools. And they always want to win.
*forgive the snarkish reply, I'm kinda pissed of at somebody like that now*
auburn
Written Jan. 20, 2008 / Report /
Because they want to be perceived as having more knowledge than they really have.
jark
Written Jan. 20, 2008 / Report /
Because they want to piss you off by annoying you to no end.
solepsis
Written Jan. 20, 2008 / Report /
I might not be as inclined to argue on a non-tech topic, but I know my tech! I spend time reading blogs and listening to podcasts. People just can't understand that I know more about it than them, but there's no way to prove your point in an argument without making people mad.
theartofbeing
Written Jan. 20, 2008 / Report /
I've always wondered the same thing. But at the same time, he probably *thought* he knew what he was talking about, and therefor, assumed he had the right to argue.
I've also always wondered, if in arguements such as that one, does the other person, who we feel has no idea what they're talking about, think we don't know what we're talking about?
I guess it all comes down to having something other than information from the two poeple in the arguement, to decide who does, or doesn't, know what they're talking about.
Ozone42
Written Jan. 20, 2008 / Report /
Because people don't question things, or research.
The guy probably heard all of that stuff once somewhere, and just took it to heart immediately. Now he's regurgitating it to you. He never thought about it, he thinks it's true--so it must be.